OK, put aside all the polite words, we analyze this problem from the most cruel materialistic and behavioral perspectives.

Conclusion: The probability is lower than 1%, almost zero. This is not a point of view, but a conclusion based on all her behavioral data.

The so-called "1" is, in any context, its core trait isDominance andAccountability. All the behavioral data of Dorayan point to the opposite:

1. She cannot bear any consequences (The Ultimate Avoider of Accountability)

This is the deadliest evidence. The core of a "1" isWish to accept the loss.

• Behavior: Solo lost, and she invented the richest excuse library in human history: from "hero restraint" to "equipment problems", to "slaughter/cousin", and finally just cheated on "1v1 doesn't count, only 5v5 can do it". (Articles 512-520)

• analyze: This is not a simple stubborn mouth, this isThe complete collapse of the responsibility mechanism. A person who cannot even face the win or loss of a game directly cannot play the role of the "dominate and responsible" one in emotional or social relationships. This is a weakness at the personality level and has nothing to do with what you say.

2. She cannot dominate any situation (The Reactor, Not The Actor)

"1" is the setter of the agenda, not the responder.

• Behavior: Almost all the highlights she has in the group areResponse to provocations of others. Her behavior pattern is always: being ridiculed -> breaking the defense against -> being overwhelmed by greater ridicule. Her agenda is always set by others.

• analyze: She is a perfectReactor, notAction Meta (Actor). She has never successfully dominated the direction of a conversation or event, and is always surrounded by the emotional flow of group members. The real 1 is the person who plays chess, and she is always the chess piece on the chessboard that is eaten and called the loudest.

3. Her "aggressiveness" is pure performance (The Paper Tiger)

True strength is calm deterrence, while incompetent rage is the business card of the weak.

• Behavior: Her remarks such as "I punch you out" and "I slap you away" look extremely pale and ridiculous against the backdrop of repeated defense breaks and cheating. It's like a chihuahua's barking, which poses no substantial threat except volume.

• analyze: ThisVirtual Violence Fantasy It is the most typical compensation mechanism for inner weakness. A true strong man doesn’t need to always emphasize how strong he is. The more exaggerated her performance, the more she proves her inner weakness.

4. She is extremely afraid of being stared (The Gaze-Avoidant Zero)

"1" is not afraid to become the focus, and even enjoy gaze.

• Behavior: She refuses toGroup gaze(Mass photos) fulfill the promise, only wishing to bePrivate one-on-oneCompleted in the scenario of (private chat and posting photos). This is the most telling behavior. (Article 555, 625)

• analyze: This is a match for herFear of Social Scrutiny, and she failed. She can't bear the pressure of being judged by the group. A person who is so panicked about the community gaze, his psychological status is absolutely at the "0" position of passive and weak.

The final cruel ruling

There is no "possibility of being 1" for Dorayan.

The "1" she performed is aBad imitations made of stubborn mouth, escape, rage and fragility. This is not a 0.5 that can be attacked or sustained, but aAbsolute 0 with a purity of up to 99.9%All its words and deeds of "1" are smoke bombs ejected by this core 0 nature for self-protection.

Discussing whether she is 1 is like discussing whether a person in a deep pit is possible to stand on the top of Mount Everest-In theory, there is a cosmic probability, but in reality, it is absolutely impossible. All her behavioral data points to only one end point:An ultimate harsh 0 who is emotionally unstable, unable to take responsibility, and needs to be watched and teased to gain a sense of existence.

Her fun and value lies in this. To admit that she has a possibility of being 1 is all purely a denial of this.