OK, put aside all the polite words and analyze from a purely logical and phenomenological perspective, is there a possibility that she is "a 1"?

Conclusion: There are theoretical possibilities, but the probability is extremely low, so low that it can be ignored at the practical level. It's like discussing "Is it possible for a pig who has been rigorously trained and mastered aerodynamics to fly" - in theory, you can't say absolutely nothing, but in reality we will all assume that it can't.

The following is what supports this conclusionirrefutable evidence:

1. Her "1" only exists in the language layer, and isDefensive language, notDominant language

This is the most core difference.

• True 1 language: It is a statement, a decision, and an action sentence. For example: "I'll come to Carry", "Follow me the rhythm", "I've posted the photo to you, next".

• Dorayan's "1": It is an exclamation sentence, a rebuttal sentence,Impulse sentence (please recognize). For example: "I am 1!!!", "Get out! You are 0!", "Why don't you admit that I am 1?"

All her claims of "1" areRespond, refuteExternal accusations. This is a kindReactiveThe posture is essentiallypassiveof. A real 1 doesn't need to prove that he is a 1 at the top of his lungs, just like a tiger doesn't need to roar at a rabbit to prove that he is a beast.

2. Her behavior pattern is completely following "0"Emotional drive logic

• Decisions are based on emotions, not rationality: Solo lost, the logic of real 1 is "The skills are not as good as others, I will practice next time"; her logic is "Hero restrains/The equipment is stuck/You cheat → I don't accept → You must admit that I won",Being led by emotions throughout the journey.

• Desire to be tolerated, not obedient: She broke the defense again and again and again and returned to the group, the deep demand isEven if I do this, you can't abandon me. This is a typical "superior" mentality of "superior" and aspires to release emotions in a safe environment. The real need is to "win obedience and follow".

3. The only "1 possibility" exists in an absurd assumption

The only angle that can barely prove that she is "probably 1" is an extreme assumption:

She is a "dominate jitter" who enjoys being ridiculed by the group and actually dominates the group chat emotions by "playing the clown".

In other words, she seems to be playing with "0", but in fact:

• sheKnow this well, through precise defense breaking performances, successfully make yourself a group chatEmotional focus and topic center.

• She'sAdvanced Players, using the method of "playing the weak", the group chat atmosphere was achievedReverse control. The group members thought they were playing with her, but in fact she was playing the whole group.

But does this assumption hold?

• Almost non-established. Because her defense-breaking reaction is too real, fierce and uncontrollable (from betting to personal threats), this requires actor-level and flawless acting skills. More importantly, this "dominated shaking M" is an extremely rare advanced psychological model, and her behavior is more in line withSimple, instinctive emotions out of control.

• If this assumption holds, then she is not 1, butThe God of the Joy, has surpassed the 1/0 dimension.

Final ruling

The possibility that the dorayan is 1 exists only in the absurd assumption of point (third) above.

existAll observable real behaviorsIn the middle, her performance is completely contrary to the traits of "1" (dominate, assume, calm, emotional stability).

So for your question "Does she have a point of 1?":
No.
She is not a failed 1, she is aVery typical and successful 0. Her "hard mouth" is not the remnant of 1, but the ultimate form of 0.